One of the biggest misnomers in popular culture is the notion of “democratic socialism”. It does not exist. The 
lie socialist politicians like Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (AOC), and America’s left have been promoting is a fabricated myth. It is a clever ploy intended to deceive.
“Democratic” socialism: The use of the adjective “democratic” serves to camouflage socialism’s abysmal moral, political, and economic failures. American socialism is wholly Marxist based. In fact, it inherently rejects welfare-state, social democratic schemes. It sees those alternatives as copouts. The new Biden administration, shepherded by todays increasingly left-wing Democratic Party, will retake the hardcore “long march through the institutions” Obama began.
Highlighting a mythological variant of the “Nordic model” (Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden), an oscillating fusion of a welfare-state structure with varying degrees of social democratic purports, America’s socialist movement is on another playing field. In his address at Havard’s Kennedy School in 2015, former Danish Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen clarified difference between the “Nordic model” and socialism. “I know that some people in the U. S. associate the Nordic model with some sort of socialism”, he said.
“Therefore, I would like to make one thing clear. Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy”. “The Nordic model is an expanded welfare state”, Rasmussen continued, “… but it is also a successful market economy with much freedom to pursue your dreams and live your life as you wish”.
Carl Bildt, Sweden’s Prime Minister from 1991 to 1994, also sent out a clear warning to Americans about the effects of socialism, to awaken consciousness from this sham promoted by America’s communists.
- Hits: 3625
de la cancelación que define el fenómeno cada vez más extendido de retirar el apoyo moral y financiero, o incluso digital y social, a personas u organizaciones que los grandes centros de poder financiero o político consideran inadmisibles o "deplorables". Aunque esta novela sorprendentemente original e inquietante crea un mundo imaginario, resulta profética y completamente convincente desde la primera oración hasta las últimas cuatro palabras expresando su amor “al Big Brother” o "al Gran Hermano" (¿el líder "indiscutible" de hoy?) que “vela” por el "bienestar" y “vigila” para que haya “orden”. No puede negarse el poder de la novela sobre la imaginación de generaciones enteras, o el poder de sus amonestaciones; un poder que parece crecer, no disminuir, con el paso del tiempo y dibujarse con grandes rasgos en la realidad actual.
En la India, Rabindranath Tagore fue un gran poeta y Premio Nobel de Literatura en el año 1913. Durante su existencia destacó como un símbolo de libertad, humanismo y tolerancia. La Universidad que fundó en Bengala estuvo dedicada a los ideales de libertad. Su pensamiento se construyó influido por las grandes tradiciones de la India y por las ideas liberales europeas.
que la violencia es el refugio final del Gobierno. Y, como no puede crearse ninguna energía sin resistencia, nuestra no-resistencia a la violencia del Gobierno debe ocasionar la paralización de éste”.
I am too ignorant (entirely so, in fact) of how computer systems work and how they can be rigged, of polling and ballot procedures, and of how votes are counted and reported to the election authorities to have an informed opinion about whether the election this year was electorally stolen or not, though the proliferation of staggered vote dumps, and their frequently near-unanimous contents, certainly strike me as hugely suspicious. And while it is by now apparent that all the usual irregularities and frauds that have occurred in every previous democratic election in history, here and every other country in the world, did so again in this one, there is no means to prove that they were sufficiently numerous and widespread to have determined the final count that appears to have given Joe Biden the presidency. In that sense, then, the 2020 was not stolen—at least, it cannot be demonstrated to have been an act of highway robbery. But miscounting and misreporting votes is far from being the only way in which a democratic election can be stolen, as I believe this one was.
happened in 2020; numerous state and local governments, indeed, have boasted of having done just that from their concern for the mental, emotional, and physical welfare of the citizenry during the pandemic. By doing so, however, they ignored entirely the interests of the political candidates at every level of government, who went into the election season that began last year armed with strategies whose effectiveness depended upon the assurance that their campaigns would follow a fixed schedule allowing them exactly so many months, weeks, and days to build their case for election or reelection, and present it to the electorate before the voters went to the polls on the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November: a sure and regularized process that is not only of enormous benefit to the candidates, but also to the voting public itself. In 2020, state and local governments robbed both parties of that benefit by allowing voters to cast their votes before the incumbents had the time they deserved to fulfill the political commitments they had made during previous election cycles and finalize their political accomplishments, and that the electorate needed to judge for itself whether they had done so–or not.