Reply: A delicate question on democracy and the rule of law
Topic History of: A delicate question on democracy and the rule of law
Max. showing the last 10 posts - (Last post first)
All the text in the message will be deleted and replaced by text from category template.
Max. showing the last 10 posts - (Last post first)
The Participatory Democracy Cultural Initiative, Inc. (PDCI), fully supports Cora Pfafferott and the full Democracy International team in their efforts to promote the European Citizens Initiative as well as their devotion to advocate human rights and the rule of law as shown in Cora's post.
On December 10th, 2011, our PDCI drafted and approved a Proclamation titled "
The Rule of Law ─ Litmus Test for Democracy
" to promote the same goals from our own perspective. In our Proclamation we underlined that:
«Modern Political Science accepts democracy as the rule of the people because the “people” is not a majority but a whole, implying a consensual base as an essential requirement for the “people” to rule. Such a consensual base is what we now call the “rule of law”, meaning that government and individuals are subject to the law.».
Once we identified the premises required to lay the foundations of the rule of law, our Proclamation concludes that:
«Under the rule of law any society has the right to consider itself guided by Christian, Buddhist, Muslim or secular principles, as it wishes, as long as the fundamental rights of all members of that society (minorities as well as majorities) are fully respected. That is the litmus test for Democracy.»
Do you know how democracy and the rule of law relate to each other?
I was asking myself this question when listening to politicians and media commentators at the beginning of this year. They maintained that in view of developments in European states, such as Poland, Hungary or Switzerland, the rule of law was threatened and that they were undermining democracy.