It is fair and correct to point out a ruler's mistakes and, if necessary, to campaign. However, when someone claims that the ruler is "absolutely wrong in everything he does," he is demonstrating fanaticism. The new president of this country is making some regrettable mistakes, such as his arrogant policy of seeking to impose a surrendering peace on Ukraine. And this is just one example.
On the other hand, it is imperative that critics answer why they so fiercely oppose the new government's order to conduct a series of audits of the administrative management of many government agencies and departments. Are they perhaps afraid that scams in which they are involved will continue to be discovered or that their political and/or economic interests are in danger?
Furthermore, why do they want to prevent the reduction of a huge bureaucracy that proliferates into redundant agencies that compete with each other to achieve overlapping objectives? What is their real justification for opposing administrative waste and the efforts to control it? Do they intend to continue to drive the country into debt until it is bankrupt? For what purpose? Is it that they want to build on its ruins a new society that is radically different from the one that made this country great?
Last edit: 24 Feb 2025 19:26 by Gerardo E. Martínez-Solanas.
Topic Author
