Gender ideology, a weapon of cultural Marxism

Gender Reassignment: Biological, Ideological, and Economic Implications

The discussion on gender reassignment has intensified in recent decades, integrating biological, psychological, and social aspects. We will analyze why biological gender is unalterable, the motivations underlying gender transition treatments, the neo-Marxist ideologies that influence it, and the economic dynamics that operate in this area. Different perspectives will be explored, to present a critical and reasoned analysis of the various factors associated with this contemporary phenomenon.

The Biological Reality of Sex

The biological reality of sex is a fundamental starting point in the discussion of gender identity. From a scientific perspective, biological gender is determined by the chromosomes that individuals possess, which are distributed in a characteristically binary way in the male and female sexes. However, the rise of gender theory has challenged this view, arguing that gender identity may not necessarily be aligned with biology. This approach has gained traction in academic and political circles of the neo-Marxist right, pushing the absurd idea that individuals can redefine their sex according to their preferences when in reality they can only redefine their desire or their feeling of belonging to a gender that is not the biological one. However, it is important to note that biological gender change through surgical procedures or hormonal treatments is not possible. Although external characteristics and some physiological aspects may be altered, the underlying biological bases remain in the body. These hormonal and surgical treatments are irreversible and seriously harm the person's health.

The motivations behind transition treatments are complex. They are often presented as a solution to gender dysphoria*,  where people experience an incongruence between their gender identity and their biological sex. However, there are cases in which these interventions are promoted without an in-depth diagnosis or without assessing the long-term impact on the mental and physical health of individuals. Even more worrying is the lack of a clear consensus among health professionals on best practices in this field. Criticism suggests that sometimes social pressure and political and cultural norms can influence individuals' decisions more than a genuine desire to transition to the perceived or desired sex.
 

*Gender dysphoria is a psychological maladjustment that occurs when a person's gender identity does not match the biological sex they were assigned at birth. It is characterized by a feeling of discomfort or distress and can manifest in children, adolescents, and adults.

The Ideological Motivations for Gender Change

Additionally, it is relevant to consider the ideological motivations that play a crucial role in this discussion. Neo-Marxist ideas, which focus on the deconstruction of traditional structures of power and family, have embraced gender identity as a battleground. These movements promulgate the idea that gender categories are social constructs that must be challenged and altered. There is an enthusiasm for movements that seek inclusion and diversity, but this deregulation of gender identity generates confusion about family and social roles. The stability that is traditionally associated with the family is in tension with these new ideas that seek to change and control society, generating deep divisions in it.

Biden's Gender Manipulations Affect Sports, Women's Prisons

Women's sports have been affected by Biden's manipulation to favor transgender athletes and affect biological women in competitions by allowing transgender biological men to compete in women's sports, even in schools they could also use women's bathrooms, locker rooms, and bedrooms.

Men who consider themselves women and incur crimes that involve imprisonment can be assigned to prisons for biological women.

The Economic Motivations Behind Gender Reassignment

The economic motivations behind gender reassignment are equally significant and should not be overlooked. The growing industry related to gender transition medicine has created a context where medical interventions have become a very lucrative business for unscrupulous professionals. From clinics offering gender reassignment surgeries to pharmaceutical companies producing hormones, economic interests are ever-present.

The commercialization of gender identity has generated an influx of capital that could influence the way gender dysphoria is addressed, fostering a culture where transition is presented as a viable option without critical analysis of its disastrous consequences. This dynamic raises questions about the lack of ethics of health care professionals and organizations that promote gender change from childhood and adolescence since they are more interested in enriching themselves than addressing the irreversibility of inducing minors to decide without clarifying the irreversible damage that treatments and surgeries could cause.

Donald Trump Will End the “Madness” of Gender Reassignment

Donald Trump will end the "madness" of gender reassignment, especially among minors, he said he will implement punishments for doctors and hospitals that perform these interventions. Trump argues that children should not be told they were born with the wrong gender and attributes this issue to the "radical left." It will also prohibit the sending of state funds to fund gender transition treatments and the creation of a law prohibiting minors from receiving gender reassignment health care in all 50 states. It also plans to investigate the pharmaceutical industry and hospitals, seeking to determine if they have hidden serious side effects of these interventions for profit.

In addition, Trump opposes the participation of trans women in women's sports competitions and proposed that doctors who treat transgender youth be excluded from programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. A private right will also be established for patients who regret receiving gender-affirming medical care when they were minors to sue their doctors. This position is in line with the previous Trump administration, which banned transgender people from enlisting in the military.

In the Biden-Kamala administration, the discourse on gender reassignment was polarized with the extremist leftist interests of family destruction. On the one hand, part of progressive sectors with neo-Marxist tendencies sought to mask these transgender treatments as a form of empowerment and personal freedom. On the other hand, critical voices arose warning about the dangers of moving in this direction without deep reflection and a proven scientific approach. This debate provoked by the Biden-Kamala administration has its days numbered.

Conclusions:

We are not against the right to free will of those who decide to change their sex or with whom they prefer another sexual orientation, nor are we against the gay, lesbian or rainbow complex of LGBTQIA+ opinions, nor do we intend to discriminate against them because of their sexual orientation and much less to retaliate for the identity they choose.

    What we are against and strongly oppose is that this minority intends to implement their neo-Marxist ideology and change our conservative, moral, and Judeo-Christian values of the concept of family. We demand respect for our concepts of the existence of biological genders, just as we respect their rights, we also oppose that they transform our schools into fields of indoctrination of their neo-Marxist ideologies of sexuality,  and the ideas of subjecting children to the practices of mutilation or transformation of their genital organs and psychological, hormonal and/or surgical therapies of child sex change.

* José Tarano is a technical producer, graphic designer, collaborator, and researcher at Patria de Martí ► and The CubanAmerican Voice